<strike id="tjr1b"></strike>
<ruby id="tjr1b"></ruby>
<strike id="tjr1b"></strike>
<strike id="tjr1b"></strike>
<strike id="tjr1b"><i id="tjr1b"><cite id="tjr1b"></cite></i></strike>
<strike id="tjr1b"><dl id="tjr1b"><ruby id="tjr1b"></ruby></dl></strike>
<strike id="tjr1b"></strike>
<span id="tjr1b"><video id="tjr1b"></video></span>
<th id="tjr1b"><video id="tjr1b"><span id="tjr1b"></span></video></th>

Software Expert Witness

Caught in an ERP lawsuit? Contemplating litigation?

We help plaintiffs and defendants prepare for trial with our ERP expert witness services.

Experience Counts

As an attorney?or organization preparing for trial or investigating?the feasibility?of trial, Panorama’s independent?team of experts will prove invaluable.?We are called upon to investigate the feasibility of litigation, provide software expert witness testimony and build background reporting for some of the industry’s highest-profile ERP lawsuits. We have worked with organizations ranging from multi-national conglomerates, to boutique and large law firms, as well as state offices of the Attorney General.

Why Work With Us?

As independent ERP expert service professionals, we have hands-on experience with hundreds of software vendors. Our firm is not tied to a single law firm or software vendor, allowing us to focus on all types of clients and industries. We work for both plaintiffs and defendants, software vendors, system integrators and their customers.

Our differentiator is using a team-based approach to provide expertise beyond just the testifying expert, which is cost-effective and efficient for our clients. We have multiple software expert witnesses available for provision of reports, depositions and testimonies.

Trusted & Recommended

Sample Client Engagements

We have deployed our ERP expert witness services for some of the industry’s highest-profile and highest-value ERP lawsuits. Below is a snapshot of a few of our past software expert witness clients and engagements. The clients whose law firms engaged Panorama are shown in bold font.

  • State of Maryland?Office of the Attorney General
  • Lyons Magnus, Inc.?v. Fujitsu America, Inc. – Retained by Baker Manock & Jensen, PC
  • Partner Services, Inc. v.?Avanade, Inc. –?Retained by Kirkland & Ellis LLP
  • The United States of America and the State of Illinois ex. rel. Kathy Pishghadamian v.?Nicor Gas, Inc.?– Retained by Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A.
  • Flotek Industries, Inc. v.?CD Group, Inc.?– Retained by Miller & Martin PLLC
  • Midwest Tape, LLC v.?ESR Associates, Inc. and Itelligence, Inc.?– Retained by Ulmer & Berne LLP
  • WBM Office Systems?v. NMB Solutions – Retained by Miller Thomson LLP.
  • State of Maryland?Office of the Attorney General
  • Lyons Magnus, Inc.?v. Fujitsu America, Inc. – Retained by Baker Manock & Jensen, PC
  • Partner Services, Inc. v.?Avanade, Inc. –?Retained by Kirkland & Ellis LLP
  • The United States of America and the State of Illinois ex. rel. Kathy Pishghadamian v.?Nicor Gas, Inc.?– Retained by Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A.
  • Flotek Industries, Inc. v.?CD Group, Inc.?– Retained by Miller & Martin PLLC
  • Midwest Tape, LLC v.?ESR Associates, Inc. and Itelligence, Inc.?– Retained by Ulmer & Berne LLP
  • WBM Office Systems?v. NMB Solutions – Retained by Miller Thomson LLP.
  • Stoneridge Software, Inc.?v. Sopris Systems, LLC – Retained by Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey & Crow, P.C.
  • Grupo Viz?v. Oracle Mexico – Retained by Bufete Asali SC
  • U.S. Welding?v. TECSYS, Inc. – Retained by Marcus Stephen Harris, LLC
  • HB Fuller Co. v.?Accenture, LLP?– Retained by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • Siemens Canada, Ltd.?v. Sapient Canada, Inc. – Retained by Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP
  • California State Controllers Office v.?SAP Public Services, Inc.?– Retained by Duane Morris LLP
  • Helix Strategies & Roger Ivey?v. Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc. – Retained by Bendel Law Group
  • Dyldam Developments Pty, Ltd.?v. NEC IT Solutions Pty, Ltd. – Retained by ClarkeKann Lawyers
  • NetOnNet, AB?v. Epicor Software – Retained by Setterwalls Advokatbyra AB Sweden
  • Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v.?International Business Machines (IBM)?– Retained by Kirkland & Ellis LLP

More Sample? Engagements

  • Stoneridge Software, Inc.?v. Sopris Systems, LLC – Retained by Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey & Crow, P.C.
  • Grupo Viz?v. Oracle Mexico – Retained by Bufete Asali SC
  • U.S. Welding?v. TECSYS, Inc. – Retained by Marcus Stephen Harris, LLC
  • HB Fuller Co. v.?Accenture, LLP?– Retained by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • Siemens Canada, Ltd.?v. Sapient Canada, Inc. – Retained by Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP
  • California State Controllers Office v.?SAP Public Services, Inc.?– Retained by Duane Morris LLP
  • Helix Strategies & Roger Ivey?v. Transunion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc. – Retained by Bendel Law Group
  • Dyldam Developments Pty, Ltd.?v. NEC IT Solutions Pty, Ltd. – Retained by ClarkeKann Lawyers
  • NetOnNet, AB?v. Epicor Software – Retained by Setterwalls Advokatbyra AB Sweden
  • Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v.?International Business Machines (IBM)?– Retained by Kirkland & Ellis LLP

Allegations We Address with our ERP Expert Witness Services

expert witness tab 1
  • Fraud and misrepresentation
  • Breach of contract
  • “Off-the-shelf” software capability misrepresentation and claims
  • Undefined roles and poorly executed responsibilities (as related to the internal project team, VAR, ERP vendor, ERP consultant or system integrator)
  • Lack of skills and competencies
  • Poor project management
  • Poor benefits realization
  • Poor implementation planning, resourcing and budgeting
  • Errors in customization
  • Errors in integration
  • ERP failure
  • Operational disruption or loss related to the ERP system

Listen to our Podcast, What Would Your Failed Enterprise Software Implementation Say if it Could Talk?

Need to Speak With an ERP Expert Witness?

Contact us today for a free initial consultation to evaluate the merits of your case.

五月天在线视频国产在线